Product health baseline
Establish what exists, who owns it, and where operational risk currently sits.
- Repository, build, and account access review
- Dependency and SDK inventory
- Crash, error, and analytics visibility
- Known defects and release history

Post-launch mobile product operations
Scallar helps teams keep mobile products dependable as operating systems, dependencies, APIs, devices, stores, security expectations, and business priorities change.
Current code and account access
Incident and response model
OS, SDK, and API compatibility
Maintenance vs enhancement scope
What the engagement covers
Monitoring, triage, compatibility, upgrades, releases, and a visible improvement backlog. The proposal names assumptions, exclusions, responsibilities, and acceptance evidence so the product can be evaluated beyond a screen count.
Establish what exists, who owns it, and where operational risk currently sits.
Use a clear intake and triage model for issues that affect customers and operations.
Separate maintenance obligations from enhancements so budget and priorities stay visible.
A reviewable delivery path
Each stage resolves a different source of uncertainty. Decisions, not activity, move the project forward.
Review code, builds, environments, stores, accounts, dependencies, APIs, analytics, incidents, and open work.
Prioritize release blockers, crashes, security-sensitive dependencies, failing integrations, and ownership gaps.
Define intake, severity, testing, approval, store submission, monitoring, and communication responsibilities.
Use incidents, analytics, feedback, and business priorities to plan bounded enhancements.

Scope before estimate
Support handles questions and incidents. Maintenance keeps the existing product compatible and reliable. Enhancements change product behavior. Mixing all three into one vague bucket makes priorities, response expectations, and cost difficult to manage.
Useful outputs
Current-state risks, dependency inventory, access gaps, release health, monitoring coverage, and priorities.
Issue intake, severity, responsibilities, environments, testing, approvals, release steps, and communication.
Separated maintenance, defects, technical risk, and enhancement work with agreed priorities and estimates.
Connected authority
Use these pages to compare scope, platform, QA, cost, and long-term ownership before requesting a proposal.
Questions before scoping
It can include monitoring, incident triage, bug fixes, OS and dependency updates, API compatibility, regression testing, store releases, documentation, and a process for estimating enhancements.
Potentially, after reviewing source access, build reproducibility, documentation, environments, accounts, dependencies, technical risk, and the current issue backlog.
It can use a monthly capacity or a defined project for stabilization and upgrades. The right model depends on release frequency, incident expectations, product risk, and backlog size.
New features should be separated from compatibility and reliability work unless the agreement defines a shared monthly capacity and clear prioritization rules.
Operating systems, device behavior, store requirements, SDKs, dependencies, APIs, certificates, and vendor services continue to change even when the business has not requested a feature.
Pricing depends on code health, platforms, environments, dependencies, integrations, release frequency, response expectations, test coverage, and expected enhancement capacity.
A practical next step